Farmhouse Hearts and Darts, Part 2

Tonight I bring you two shots from what will eventually be my son's bedroom. When I think of a cottage getaway kids' room, I imagine a light and airy white room, with a bed and dresser and shelves with artistically arranged shells. I suspect that romantic notion will be dispelled as soon as we've been in there a while and the usual clutter of clothes and books is strewn over the floor, but the child should have at least a decent base to build on, shouldn't he?

So, here's a "before" picture, taken on the day we picked up the keys. Start with a dozen or two layers of wallpaper that have been partially stripped off. Add some mysterious squares of plaster that have been removed, perhaps to blow insulation into the wall, and replaced with squares of drywall that don't fit and aren't flush with the wall around them. Add stomach-turning green paint on the trim and a baseboard heater. You can't really see the flaking paint and plaster on the ceiling in this shot, or the hundreds of dead cluster flies between the window and the storm window, or the "closet" that consists of a piece of wood with nails sticking out of it. (I'm sure you'll take my word for it).

I do believe the bones are good here. The room is small - something like 9.5 feet square - but fortunately the knee wall is over 5 feet tall. There won't be any room left over after a bed, combo armoire/dresser and bookcase go in, but it will be a cosy retreat for him eventually.

Today the "good" picture is harder than the "bad", because I don't know if everyone else will see it the same way that I do. I love the charm of the old painted chair, the faded flowers on the wallpaper, and especially the linoleum rug.

I had only recently read about these linoleum rugs that were popular at the turn of the century. They came in various sized squares that were appropriate for a room, and they could be just laid out and used the way they came. They were generally printed with a border, and usually faked to look like a real woven wool rug.

This has no border, so it may have just been cut from a square of sheet linoleum. The floor boards (which you can't see in this shot) were originally painted to match the background of the pattern. The pattern features an acanthus leaf pattern, very similar to what you see in William Morris designs. The edges and center are pretty worn, but I should be able to salvage a good-sized rectangle of it to use as a bedside rug in my own bedroom later.

Farmhouse Hearts and Darts - Part 1 of an Occasional Series

Our new farmhouse needs a ton of work, and I wanted to highlight some of the things that drew me to it, as well as some of the more hilarious aspects that need to be addressed. So, here's part 1 of what will hopefully be an occasional series - a pair of pictures. (Click for full-size versions in all their glory).

I'll do the 'bad' first today - this is a corner of what will eventually be our dining room. I'm sure you'll notice right off the bat that there's a toilet in it. There's a sink on the other side of the window, to go with it. But, notice too, the exposed pipes for the water supply and waste - those connect with the upstairs bathroom. They just don't have the charm of exposed pipes in a loft, now, do they? And why is the wallpaper so dark in that upper corner? It's not a lighting issue with the camera, I assure you. Did the former occupant used to sit there and smoke? No, on second thought, don't answer that.

I suppose the toilet roll holder on the back of the door is quite convenient. And, sadly, we'll probably end up using this toilet (well scrubbed first) when we replace the upstairs bathroom.

On the better side, here's our woodstove on the first night we had company over. My dad built the fire when we arrived, and my mom prepared some spiced cider that's warming up in the red soup pot. Although the house has electric baseboards for heat as well, I hope to burn many cords of wood in this old Fisher stove. I don't think you can make out its little feet in this shot, but you might be able to make out the pine trees gracing the doors.

Right from the first day I staked out my favourite sitting spot, in front of the stove, with a view out the side window to the east where an old barn is in the process of falling down in the most picturesque way imaginable. As long as there's a basket of knitting and a bookshelf nearby, I think I'll be able to amuse myself quite well.

98 Leuty Avenue

You know what I would do if I had three million dollars I could leverage? I would buy 98 Leuty Avenue.

It's a lovely old three-storey apartment building in the Beach, currently for sale for $2,980,000. There are 15 units, and from the pictures I've seen, mostly sympathetically renovated. Of the 15 units, four are bachelor apartments, six are 1-bedroom units, four are two-bedroom units, and the last one is a 2-bedroom plus office intended for the owners.

The MLS listing claims that the net profit each year is just short of $200K. That would just about cover the mortgage for it at current rates (although those are going up, of course). I'd split it into 15 co-ownership units and sell them off as they became available, keeping whichever one I liked best (probably one of the 2-bedroom units) to live in once there are no kids at home and my husband and I are tired of rattling around this big house.

It's hard to find comparable real estate listings to know what the units would sell for, since condos are not very common in the Beach, especially 80-year-old ones. Drive seven minutes west to the new live/work lofts at Carlaw and Dundas, and a 1-bed, 1-bath will set you back $354,900... but drive north-east to Victoria Park and Danforth instead, and the same size unit is only half that, at $178,000. In my scheme they would be co-ownerships rather than condos, and I also haven't quite figured out how much lower the prices are for those on average.

It's a moot point, since I don't have any seed money for this scheme... but I do enjoy thinking about it!

Bonds

I was introduced to the concept of buying bonds rather than stocks or mutual funds by the book Your Money or Your Life, originally written almost 20 years ago. Most reviewers now say that the book is useful except for the investment advice, but I was intrigued enough to read further. Isn't a guaranteed income source with no risk and no fees a good idea, I thought? I followed it up with reading Hank Cunningham's In Your Best Interest: The Ultimate Guide to the Canadian Bond Market.

The basic concept is that corporations borrow money, offering a fixed rate of interest paid twice a year, and repaying the principal on a certain date in the future. For instance, I have the info on an RBC Capital Trust bond up on my screen right now. The maturity date is December 31, 2015 (although maturity dates can be any day of the year, not just the last day). The interest rate that the bond pays is 4.87%. By convention all bonds pay their interest twice a year, on the anniversary date of the bond and the half-year anniversary. So if I buy a $5000 worth of this bond, it would pay me 4.87% * $5000 / 2 = $121.75 on December 31 and June 30 every year.

Where things get interesting is that regular consumers like us rarely buy bonds directly from the corporation. They are bought in huge blocks by banks and trading companies, and re-sold to the consumer. So what happens if a bond is paying only 2% interest, and the overall interest rates rise? Or conversely, the bond pays 10% interest, and rates have fallen? The trading companies compensate by either discounting the purchase rate of the bond, or charging a premium for it.

As an another example, there's a Groupe Aeroplan Inc. bond that matures on 2012/4/23 and pays 9% interest. Sounds awesome, right? But, that's offset by the price of the bond, which is $107.750 for each $100 of bond. For that reason the printed interest rate on the bond is called the "coupon", and the effective interest that you earn is called the "yield". The annual yield for this bond works out to be 3.1075%.

Here's how that bond would work in practice:
1. I buy $5000 worth (the usual minimum). Because the coupon rate is high, there is a premium on the price. It costs me $107.750 for each $100, which is a total of 50 * 107.750 = $5,387.50.
2. Since the bond pays the next interest on April 23, the bank figures out what portion of that is mine and which portion is theirs. There have been 48 days since the last interest payment on October 23, and there will be 134 days since the next payment. The payment will be 9% * $5,000 / 2 = $225, so the bank adds 48/134 of this ($80.67), which is their portion, to what they charge me. They call this accrued interest.
3. On April 23, 2011, I get paid the entire $225 interest for that six-month period.
4. On October 23, 2011, the six-month anniversary of the bond, I get another $225 interest payment.
5. On April 23, 2012, the final interest payment of $225 is paid, and the original $5,000 value of the bond is also returned to me.

One way that bonds are different than mutual funds (other than the obvious) is that there are no fees with bonds. The banks buy them at one price and sell them to you at another, and they make their money on that spread. When I see a yield of 3.1075%, I know that's exactly what it is, with no fees to buy it, no management fees while it sits in my account, and no fees when it matures.

I've been buying bonds for our retirement for two and a half years now. I use Scotia ITrade (formerly ETrade) and RBC. The yields are not as exciting as what mutual funds used to promise us - I generally get from 4% to 8% in the time frames I look at (I stagger my maturity dates and have bonds maturing as late as 2022). However, when I consider that a GIC that matures in the middle of 2012 gets only 1.5% interest, that 3.1% yield bond seems like a smarter place to park my money.

Please note that I am talking about bonds, and not bond funds; none of the benefits I mention above apply to bond funds.

Small Houses

One of my favourite ways of wasting time is to look on house plan websites for what I think of as "Ontario cottages", to see how they use the space. I don't think I've ever actually found one yet, but I do find lots of other interesting houses that I like.

Of course I'm a sucker for a pretty artist's rendition, but who isn't? (Click on any of the images to see a larger size).

Clocking in at only 950 square feet, not much bigger than my husband's condo, this plan from houseplans.com fits two bedrooms and 1.5 baths under its dormer roof.

I like the way the full-size kitchen is open to both the living and dining rooms, using an island to demarcate the space. We tend to spend most of our time in our dining room, so having one so light-filled appeals to me.

Upstairs are the standard bathroom and two bedrooms - not too much to be said about that. I would probably build in storage along the west walls in both bedrooms, including some hanging space and drawers, rather than just a standard closet. There's a handy gap at the bottom end of the tub for a built-in linen closet as well.

The square shape of the building would not, unfortunately, suit a city lot. On a bigger lot you'd want the staircase/bathroom wall facing north, since it has the fewest windows, meaning morning sun in the living room and evening sun in the kitchen - possibly backwards, but then again, mirror plans are available too.

Co-ownership and Co-operative real estate in Toronto (A Google Map)

I've been playing around with the "My Maps" feature of Google Maps for a few years, and I finally have one to share with you.


View Co-ownerships and Co-operatives by MLS district in a larger map

The link above should take you to Google Maps, and my public map of all the co-operative and co-ownership buildings in Central Toronto, arranged and colour-coded according to the MLS system's geographical areas.

(I'll point out that by 'co-op' I mean a co-operative unit of real estate that you buy, not a co-op apartment that you rent.)

You will have to zoom out to see the most northerly building, which is at Yonge almost as far north as Steeles. Then you can zoom in to a neighbourhood you like, or play around with satellite and Google Earth views. Enjoy!

Christmas Carols

I've got a gig singing in one of those strolling Victorian quartets that you see at Christmastime. I'm pretty pleased about it - I've always wanted to be on of those singers! However, I'll be singing alto. This is probably a good thing for my voice and my nerves (I'm only sometimes in a soprano solo mood), but it means that I have to find a way to practice without the music I'll be singing from on the day.


Enter http://www.christmas-carol-music.org/. This great site includes 56 carols, all with the two things I need - standard 4-part arrangements with PDF files and midi files of each one. I open the midi file in media player, pop open the PDF, and sing away. When I get the music next weekend, I can either sing what's in the book they give me or what I've already learned - either way it will sound fine!

This doesn't, of course, include Christmas songs, like Rudolph or Frosty. Theoretically a Victorian quartet shouldn't be singing those songs, but in practice I'm sure we will. I haven't quite figured out how to handle those. Any ideas?